Make vs Apify: Which Should You Try First to Add Web Data to Your AI Agent?

Last fact-checked: November 7, 2026

Advertising disclosure: this article may contain affiliate links. If you sign up through one, we may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. See our Advertising Disclosure for details. (We have applied to the affiliate programs mentioned below and the applications are pending. Until they are approved, links go to the official sites, not tracked referral links.)

If you're building an AI agent or an automated workflow and you've hit the point where it needs to pull data from the live web, you've probably run into two names over and over: Make (a no-code automation hub) and Apify (a web-scraping and browser-automation platform). They get mentioned in the same breath so often that it's easy to assume they're interchangeable. They aren't, and picking the wrong one first can cost you a week of rebuilding your workflow.

This guide compares them on the two things that actually decide which one you should try first: what each one is built to do, and what it costs you to find that out.

Note on experience: we have hands-on, daily experience running browser automation and web-scraping workloads (headless browsers, CDP-level control, anti-bot handling) as part of real automation projects. We have not personally run production workloads on Make or Apify specifically. Everything below about their features, pricing, and affiliate terms is sourced directly from their official documentation and pricing pages (linked throughout, checked November 7, 2026) — not from first-hand testing of these two platforms.

1. What each tool is actually for

Make is a general-purpose, no-code automation hub. You connect apps (Gmail, Notion, Slack, your CRM, a webhook from your AI agent, and so on) with a visual flowchart-style builder, and it runs the whole chain for you. Web scraping is one module you can drop into a larger flow — it is not the product's center of gravity.

Apify is built specifically around collecting data from the web and running browser automation at scale. It ships as a marketplace of pre-built "Actors" (ready-made scrapers for sites like Google Search, Instagram, Amazon, etc.) plus an SDK if you want to write your own. If your agent's core job is "go get this data from the web," Apify is closer to a purpose-built tool for that job.

A simple way to decide: if you need to orchestrate a multi-step workflow where web data is one ingredient among several, Make's visual builder will likely get you there faster. If the web data collection itself is the hard part (JavaScript-heavy sites, anti-bot measures, pagination at scale, proxy rotation), Apify's purpose-built Actors and infrastructure are the more direct fit.

2. What it costs to actually try them

	Make	Apify
Free plan price	$0/month	$0/month
Free plan allowance	1,000 credits/month (official pricing page)	$5 of platform usage/month, metered at $0.20 per Compute Unit (official pricing page)
Free plan concurrency	Not stated on the page we checked	5 concurrent runs (official pricing page)
Cheapest paid plan	Not confirmed on the page we checked — third-party sources cite ~$9–12/month, unverified	Starter: $19/month ($17/month billed annually) (official pricing page)

Both free plans are real free plans, not trials, but structured differently. Make counts every action in your flow as a "credit," so a flow with many steps eats through 1,000 credits faster than you'd expect. Apify's free plan is a $5/month usage credit metered per Compute Unit, so your real cost depends heavily on the target site and Actor.

Practical takeaway: testing a single, well-defined scraping task — Apify's $5 free usage is more predictable. Testing an end-to-end workflow across several apps — Make's 1,000 free credits/month lets you build and run the whole chain before paying anything.

3. What you'd be signing up for as an affiliate

Since this site covers both building with these tools and the economics of recommending them, here's what each program's official terms say as of November 7, 2026:

Make Affiliate Program: 35% commission on referred subscription payments for 12 months from signup. Payout requires a minimum of $100 and 3 unique paying referred users in the same period; paid exclusively via Wise. No stated application review.
Apify Affiliate Program: 20% of a referred customer's payments for their first 3 months, then 30%, capped at $2,500 per referred customer. Monthly payout minimum $100 (rolls over if unmet), plus cumulative 3 paid referrals. Paid via PayPal, bank transfer, or Wise, within 15 business days of month-end.

Neither program's official pages state a residency restriction, but neither confirms unrestricted eligibility either — if applying from outside the US/EU, confirm directly with each program first.

4. Who each one suits

Try Make first if: your AI agent needs to talk to several other apps and services, web data is just one piece of a bigger chain, and you'd rather drag-and-drop a flow than write scraping logic.

Try Apify first if: the core problem is reliably getting structured data off specific, possibly JavaScript-heavy or anti-bot-protected sites, and you're willing to work with (or write) purpose-built Actors.

Try neither yet if: the site you need data from has a documented public API. Experienced scrapers in the Indie Hackers community recommend checking for a usable backend API before reaching for any scraping tool — it's cheaper and far more stable than parsing HTML.

5. What we haven't verified yet

We have not independently load-tested either platform's reliability at scale.
Make's paid-tier pricing above the free plan is not confirmed from Make's own pricing page in this pass — treat the $9–12/month figures as third-party estimates until verified directly.
Neither affiliate program's official pages confirm a residency restriction or cookie/attribution window; both are marked unconfirmed pending direct contact with each program.